Recent increases in food prices and biofuel, are they related?

I have written 3 posts in the past regarding the promotion of biofuels, specifically ethanol, as an alternative to fossil fuel, here...
1. Ethanol, for or against the environment?
2. Farm ethanol plants, part 1.
3. Farm ethanol plants, part 2.

I am aware how governments in developing countries are promoting the production of ethanol for cash, disregarding impacts on food supply. I am doubtful of the soundness of this particular strategy for economic development, specially since it is being done in the name of the environment, compared to changing our lifestyles like reducing fuel consumption.

ed out that a World Bank expert has made a "secret" report (covered in UK's The Guardian) stating that biofuels have jacked up food prices by a whooping 75%. I quote "Rising food prices have pushed 100m people worldwide below the poverty line, estimates the World Bank, and have sparked riots from Bangladesh to Egypt." While a dozen million are concerned with finding fuel for their cars, another hundred million are pummeling each other for a piece of bread. :(

I wonder how many months and dollars were needed to get that report together when common sense says that if we use our limited food resources for something else, a shortage will naturally occur.

Sadly, the report was not published and will probably stay that way. It IS the World Bank after all, funded by the world's biggest economic powers. There is hope though, as the U.K. is having second thoughts on their previous stance on the use of biofuels.

Like I said before, there is nothing wrong with using biofuels as an alternative but we should first consider where it will come from. Knee-jerk reactions and stop-gap measures often creates more problem than they were intended to solve.

Do you think that biofuels, as we know it today (usually coming from food crops or planted on farmlands), should remain in the list of alternative fuels?

Read More...

4 wheel carbon fiber bike

 Okay, it's not really a bike but its pedigree came from them. TheX-Bow is the first attempt by KTM to make a perfromance car. KTM is a company specializing in lean, mean, 2-wheeled machines and mountain and road bikes. Now they've branched out into cars.

The X-bow is by no means a sipper nor cheap but it's made for performance from hi-tech and lightweight materials like carbon fiber and powered by Audi's TFSI, which has been praised by critics for its good "balance between technology, performance, economy and environmental acceptability." All-in-all not a bad little package and a cool alternative for gas-guzzling sports cars.


Original image at UnCrate.

Read More...

Cheap gas-powered motor scooters to beat high gas prices.

There has been a surge lately for searches on motor scooters. Not surprising since entry level models can squeeze 80 miles from a gallon of gas. Don't let the "cheap" tag turn us off too. Low-cost motor scooters have smaller engines than the high-priced one, which means they are real sippers.

Consider a 50cc classic that typically retails under US$1,000.00. That engine has enough power to move a very large adult (300 pounds) at a maximum speed of 40 miles per hour and can run 90-100 miles per gallon.

For those who simply needs double that speed, 250cc models can move 400 pounds at 80 miles per hour. Of course, there's a corresponding drop in mileage to 60mpg. If we do a bit of mathematics that's a 200% increase in max speed in exchange for a 33% drop in mileage.

For individuals traveling short distances (at least within a 15 mile range), cheaper motor scooters are the better options.

Safety-concious riders may also want to check out Piaggio's (Vespa makers) 3-wheel MP3 250. Specs: 244cc, Max Speed of 77mph, and mileage of 54mpg. Price? A little over US$7,000.00.

Original image at Piaggio USA.

Read More...

The "lost" tribe of the Amazon isn't lost afterall.

The past weeks, there was an excited buzz about an uncontacted tribe somewhere near the Brazilian and Peruvian border. Turned out it was a hoax as reported here and here.

The tribe's existence has been noted, but not confirmed, since 1910. Experts from the Brazilian Indian Protection Agency have estimated and delineated the tribe's grounds and established a protection system without laying eyes on a single indigenous soul. In essence, they did remained UNCONTACTED until that very moment they were photographed.

José Carlos Meirelles, the photographer, admitted that he planned to take the pictures and conducted a 3 day fly-over of their known range in order to prove that there are still tribes living within the bowels of the Amazon largely untouched by civilization.

Fact, he was happy they came out in war paint because that means they are living happy and healthy and willing to defend their territory. We just hope that big business, those that are intent on exploiting the Amazon at least, doesn't turn this hoax into a big issue.

All is well that ends well but does the end justify the means?

Read More...